I found though that yielding just one response per side seemed pretty weak, especially when it's not always picking the best arguments for each side. (And not returning enough of the passage to fully show the argument)
It doesn't sound thorough but rather just like it's picking the first vaguely similar set of lines that it could find.
I wonder if subtle tweaks to your prompts could make it significantly more convincing?
I tried the self referential "the bible is the word of god" and got the positive: 2 Timothy "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness"
Ironically when the bible was compiled 300 years later a lot of scripture was considered to be heretical and was omitted. Further irony is that Timothy 2 in particular only just made the
cut!
I entered the topic of "going to war" and it did not return anything, but throughout history people have used the Bible as justification for going to war. And yet killing people is generally bad. Lots of nuances here but it seems like the system should have come up with something.
Love the idea
I found though that yielding just one response per side seemed pretty weak, especially when it's not always picking the best arguments for each side. (And not returning enough of the passage to fully show the argument)
It doesn't sound thorough but rather just like it's picking the first vaguely similar set of lines that it could find.
I wonder if subtle tweaks to your prompts could make it significantly more convincing?
I tried the self referential "the bible is the word of god" and got the positive: 2 Timothy "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness"
Ironically when the bible was compiled 300 years later a lot of scripture was considered to be heretical and was omitted. Further irony is that Timothy 2 in particular only just made the cut!
I entered the topic of "going to war" and it did not return anything, but throughout history people have used the Bible as justification for going to war. And yet killing people is generally bad. Lots of nuances here but it seems like the system should have come up with something.
I tried again and got this:
https://biblebothways.com/claim/war-can-be-considered-accept...
So I guess the first submission was some kind of glitch.
Yes I assume glitch! It should absolutely weigh in on war
Tried to justify that tabs are better than spaces but found no result.
Because that's a given
How does it work? Do you use some sort of LLM-powered search?
Correct. This is gpt4o-mini