This looks neat! I suppose I might ask the hard questions - how does this compare to Obsidian, which is my go-to "real time notes app that roughly feels like dealing with a plain text file but better"?
I would also make a small suggestion, which is that there is really no need to emphasize the fact that it's hand-written or without React or etc. While I suppose a small segment of users do truly care that you didn't use React, I think the primary consideration for most users will be how the app works. I would suggest mentioning how your technical decisions affect the user experience: is the performance better - and if so, can you quantify that?
Obsidian: We're mostly solving different problems. I wanted that text editor / IDE feel but with the ability to instantly share and collaborate. Bring in a full team, manage all your docs, give everyone different permissions etc.
So the problems I was thinking about were collaboration and content management between teams. But I also wanted it to work really well as a private personal tool. So in a way it's two tools in one. You can enjoy it solo, and then the hope is you've found something you like and now you can bring a team into it
Re the tech framing, I mostly mentioned it because I figured HN would find it interesting since it's the less taken path. Apologies if it came across as unrelated to the product.
Thanks for the response! My suggestion would be that if multiplayer aspects are really the key differentiator between Obsidian and your app, you should let the user see that straightaway. Maybe drop them into a shared workspace with other people or something? That could be cool.
As for the tech framing - I imagine you'll get lots of responses on that, and I'm sure it works for some people. Speaking personally, I think it irks me in particular because I feel that "React is slow" isn't really true -- but hey, we can sidestep that whole argument if you just tell me that your app loads a 100GB text file in 0.1ms or whatever :)
Hmm. Yeah that shared workspace idea is good. Tbh I just wanted to force myself to put this out there and stop polishing the dang thing! So this was the fastest way out and now I can iterate on better journeys like the one you suggest.
On the React thing, I never said React is slow! I think it's great for a lot of things. I just chose a different path because I wanted to understand every part of the main product stack. I didn't use OT or CDRT for the same reason... :|
I'm so confused… when did NewTek switch Lightwave from a 3D renderer/ design application to a notes app? :-)
(AKA: I'm not sure it's a good idea to use someone else's long-standing well-known brand in the digital space as name for your own digital space project)
Fair. The first doc you land on is in a read-only workspace (I used the app itself to write the onboarding docs, and display them in read only mode. dogfooding it). I can see how that's a bad first impression when you just want to start typing. I'll look at dropping new accounts into an editable doc instead. Thanks for checking it out.
This looks neat! I suppose I might ask the hard questions - how does this compare to Obsidian, which is my go-to "real time notes app that roughly feels like dealing with a plain text file but better"?
I would also make a small suggestion, which is that there is really no need to emphasize the fact that it's hand-written or without React or etc. While I suppose a small segment of users do truly care that you didn't use React, I think the primary consideration for most users will be how the app works. I would suggest mentioning how your technical decisions affect the user experience: is the performance better - and if so, can you quantify that?
Obsidian: We're mostly solving different problems. I wanted that text editor / IDE feel but with the ability to instantly share and collaborate. Bring in a full team, manage all your docs, give everyone different permissions etc.
So the problems I was thinking about were collaboration and content management between teams. But I also wanted it to work really well as a private personal tool. So in a way it's two tools in one. You can enjoy it solo, and then the hope is you've found something you like and now you can bring a team into it
Re the tech framing, I mostly mentioned it because I figured HN would find it interesting since it's the less taken path. Apologies if it came across as unrelated to the product.
Thanks for the response! My suggestion would be that if multiplayer aspects are really the key differentiator between Obsidian and your app, you should let the user see that straightaway. Maybe drop them into a shared workspace with other people or something? That could be cool.
As for the tech framing - I imagine you'll get lots of responses on that, and I'm sure it works for some people. Speaking personally, I think it irks me in particular because I feel that "React is slow" isn't really true -- but hey, we can sidestep that whole argument if you just tell me that your app loads a 100GB text file in 0.1ms or whatever :)
Hmm. Yeah that shared workspace idea is good. Tbh I just wanted to force myself to put this out there and stop polishing the dang thing! So this was the fastest way out and now I can iterate on better journeys like the one you suggest.
On the React thing, I never said React is slow! I think it's great for a lot of things. I just chose a different path because I wanted to understand every part of the main product stack. I didn't use OT or CDRT for the same reason... :|
I'm so confused… when did NewTek switch Lightwave from a 3D renderer/ design application to a notes app? :-)
(AKA: I'm not sure it's a good idea to use someone else's long-standing well-known brand in the digital space as name for your own digital space project)
Ha, fair point. Open to change. Will keep an eye on this.
Absolutely. This brings nostalgia and pushes for heads up at the same time.
Having trouble locating the button to produce TPS reports.
;-) love the Office Space references
Lol, glad someone caught that!
Also, I wanted to make the main guest account name Robert'); DROP TABLE but I chickened out and made it a bit more normal.
The test acc. UX flow is shit IMHO: I do not want to see the first user tips (just annoying flashes) and I can not directly edit the first doc I see.
Fair. The first doc you land on is in a read-only workspace (I used the app itself to write the onboarding docs, and display them in read only mode. dogfooding it). I can see how that's a bad first impression when you just want to start typing. I'll look at dropping new accounts into an editable doc instead. Thanks for checking it out.
"Create Account" button leads to /undefined, both in Chrome and Firefox.
Oops. I accidentally had a throttle on the signup request. That is removed now. Please try again. Sorry about that!
Seems to be a load issue, hopefully easily resolved
doesnt work. https://lightwave.so/undefined
Fixed now! Apologies.
Can't triple click and drag to highlight words... I'm out.
Thanks for the feedback. Triple-click selects the full line atm. Triple-click-drag to select multiple lines isn't in yet. On the list!
https://imgur.com/a/g37lLv2
- flickering
- keyboard appears on readonly document
- can select info text that should not be user selectable
- menu items melt into each other
- can‘t summon keyboard on editable content
- grabbing elements in a document and pulling them up leads to page refresh
- I saw a styling menu pop up once: No idea how I got that.
I am sorry but this is unusable and an awful experience on my iPhone.
https://imgur.com/a/GeErjTa
- manage subscription page broken?
Absolutely nothing here works, besides the anonymous login.
Yeah, this is desktop only right now. It's mentioned in the post and on the landing page.
Mobile isn't supported yet. Sorry about the bad experience though, I should probably add a more visible warning for mobile visitors.