Once in a while, someone uploads a heavy guitar oriented 12-tone composition to YouTube. So far, all the ones I've heard have had a very consistent heavy metal feel to them.
Each person usually has a different "algorithm" and explain how they came up with the riff or song. It can sound quite evil.
I spent a while learning English change ringing, on specially mounted church bells. It is basically an exercise in combinatorics: the "change" is applying the pattern so that the bells ring through all possible sequences that the pattern can do. At first it sounds like noise, but after a couple of years, you do start to notice a certain musicality to it. As I understand Schoenberg, one of his ideas was that you cannot re-use a note until all the others have been used, which is essentially the same requirement that change ringing has. (The bells are heavy and are swinging through their full arc, so you cannot change their order very quickly.) After realizing this, I listened to some Schoenberg and found it much more listenable than I did in college.
12-tone/serialism was a seriously dire period in modern art music. After Romanticism ran its course and maxed out the tonal possibilities of music that attempted to convey emotion, 12-tone came along to provide a rigid intellectual structure to music that had existed in the baroque and classical periods, but had been blown away by the Romantics and post-Romantics.
Unfortunately it also made listening to music a purely intellectual exercise as well, and a painful one for folks who expect tonality to be a part of any music they want to sit through.
Thankfully folks like Steve Reich, Terry Riley, and Philip Glass came along to embrace the rigid structure and intellectual design approach, but to return tonality as a core principle with Minimalism. Art Music was listenable again.
This is a pretty simplified and inverted way to look at it in my opinion.
In many ways atonality was the inevitable direction that late 19th century Romanticism was moving in, with increasingly ambiguous tonality expressed by composers like Wagner and Mahler. In the early 20th century there was an explosion of new approaches and techniques which started from this basis and pushed tonal approaches to the breaking point and beyond. Composers including Ives, Stravinsky, Schoenberg, and others were all trying new things within the realm of atonality and while we tend to look back and map history into narrow movements and philosophies to suit our current thinking, I don't think there was necessarily such a "serialism period" so much as there was the Second Viennese school along with a bunch of other composers trying things out at the same time. And even within the Second Viennese school the approaches were distinct; Berg is known for being a bit more "loose" and romantic in his usage of 12-tone technique vs. the rigid formalist Webern.
Leaving aside the dubious assertions of what is or is not listenable, the reality is that art music in the 20th century became more and more fragmented as the entire music scene changed around the world. Minimalism was just one thing that happened after serialism. Even if we exclusively focus on music labeled "European Art Music" the 20th century was a period of incredible experimentation and exploration with many different approaches to tonality (and atonality) introduced.
however much atonality and other formalisms represented an intellectual inevitability, they also are ultimately useful mostly for having mapped a good bit of the coastline defining where the experience and enjoyment of musicality is grounded in ways which are obviously embedded in both physics and our particular embodiment, and to lesser degree, culture.
Jazz did a much more nuanced mapping of that ground IMO, but to the same end result: beyond the coast there is deep water, and there we do not swim.
Nor shall we, the collective. Not so long as we live in these bodies.
Individuals can swim; individuals can endeavor or through some rare combination of circumstance find musical value and enjoyment in the water, i.e. beyond conventional melody harmony and rhythm...
...but no amount of intellectual scaffolding or historical cultural momentum can bridge it.
Humans cluster inland.
I've spend decades in the experimental sound/music community and mapped some largely unvisited coves myself, having a particular interest in what in those intellectual traditions was called musique concrete;
and been to countless "noise" shows, and lived through many generations now of enthusiastic "kids" rediscovering various aesthetics.
The lines don't budge. The cultural framing of what it means to transgress them, and the communities that form around celebration of that "transgression," are all unique in their specific concerns, and—unhappy in the same way.
Minimalism was a welcome success for pretty obvious reasons: it was a reversion and embrace of exactly those things at the heart of our embodied experience of music.
I mostly listen to minimalism but I wouldn't call 12-tone/serialism "dire." Like all periods, there's good and bad. On the other hand, I've lost my taste for Germanic 19th century music.
Matter of taste: the second Viennese school, Bartok & Shostakovitch is pretty much the only classical I can tolerate, the "mimsy" stuff leaves me cold. Horses for courses.
Bartok never wrote using the 12-tone serial method. He wrote dense harmonies, especially in his middle period (e.g. the sonatas for violin and piano), but in terms of how he devised those harmonies he has more in common with Glass than Schönberg.
Especially Bartok’s late works are more approachable (Concerto for Orchestra, Piano Concerto no. 3) and while they don’t slam home a tonal key like the end of Beethoven’s Fifth, the harmonies are plenty recognizable.
12-tone serial music always sounds to me like it belongs in a film soundtrack — it works well as background because the serial method suppresses the creation of recognizable melody as a foreground element.
Film score composers are quite famous for borrowing from 12 tone serialism - quite a bit of discussion on it available by Googling or using your favourite chatbot
I'd recommend listening to Webern's Op. 27, it's a strict 2nd Viennese school 12-tone composition but also very expensive, I love it (although it works better in a concert setting then a recording): https://youtu.be/ZEtqEzPakxA?is=JgbN1lpHF1lxrXOT
Once in a while, someone uploads a heavy guitar oriented 12-tone composition to YouTube. So far, all the ones I've heard have had a very consistent heavy metal feel to them.
Each person usually has a different "algorithm" and explain how they came up with the riff or song. It can sound quite evil.
The word I've heard for this is Dodecaphony.
Here is an example of one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCL3E0Mh4js
I spent a while learning English change ringing, on specially mounted church bells. It is basically an exercise in combinatorics: the "change" is applying the pattern so that the bells ring through all possible sequences that the pattern can do. At first it sounds like noise, but after a couple of years, you do start to notice a certain musicality to it. As I understand Schoenberg, one of his ideas was that you cannot re-use a note until all the others have been used, which is essentially the same requirement that change ringing has. (The bells are heavy and are swinging through their full arc, so you cannot change their order very quickly.) After realizing this, I listened to some Schoenberg and found it much more listenable than I did in college.
12-tone/serialism was a seriously dire period in modern art music. After Romanticism ran its course and maxed out the tonal possibilities of music that attempted to convey emotion, 12-tone came along to provide a rigid intellectual structure to music that had existed in the baroque and classical periods, but had been blown away by the Romantics and post-Romantics.
Unfortunately it also made listening to music a purely intellectual exercise as well, and a painful one for folks who expect tonality to be a part of any music they want to sit through.
Thankfully folks like Steve Reich, Terry Riley, and Philip Glass came along to embrace the rigid structure and intellectual design approach, but to return tonality as a core principle with Minimalism. Art Music was listenable again.
This is a pretty simplified and inverted way to look at it in my opinion.
In many ways atonality was the inevitable direction that late 19th century Romanticism was moving in, with increasingly ambiguous tonality expressed by composers like Wagner and Mahler. In the early 20th century there was an explosion of new approaches and techniques which started from this basis and pushed tonal approaches to the breaking point and beyond. Composers including Ives, Stravinsky, Schoenberg, and others were all trying new things within the realm of atonality and while we tend to look back and map history into narrow movements and philosophies to suit our current thinking, I don't think there was necessarily such a "serialism period" so much as there was the Second Viennese school along with a bunch of other composers trying things out at the same time. And even within the Second Viennese school the approaches were distinct; Berg is known for being a bit more "loose" and romantic in his usage of 12-tone technique vs. the rigid formalist Webern.
Leaving aside the dubious assertions of what is or is not listenable, the reality is that art music in the 20th century became more and more fragmented as the entire music scene changed around the world. Minimalism was just one thing that happened after serialism. Even if we exclusively focus on music labeled "European Art Music" the 20th century was a period of incredible experimentation and exploration with many different approaches to tonality (and atonality) introduced.
And,
however much atonality and other formalisms represented an intellectual inevitability, they also are ultimately useful mostly for having mapped a good bit of the coastline defining where the experience and enjoyment of musicality is grounded in ways which are obviously embedded in both physics and our particular embodiment, and to lesser degree, culture.
Jazz did a much more nuanced mapping of that ground IMO, but to the same end result: beyond the coast there is deep water, and there we do not swim.
Nor shall we, the collective. Not so long as we live in these bodies.
Individuals can swim; individuals can endeavor or through some rare combination of circumstance find musical value and enjoyment in the water, i.e. beyond conventional melody harmony and rhythm...
...but no amount of intellectual scaffolding or historical cultural momentum can bridge it.
Humans cluster inland.
I've spend decades in the experimental sound/music community and mapped some largely unvisited coves myself, having a particular interest in what in those intellectual traditions was called musique concrete;
and been to countless "noise" shows, and lived through many generations now of enthusiastic "kids" rediscovering various aesthetics.
The lines don't budge. The cultural framing of what it means to transgress them, and the communities that form around celebration of that "transgression," are all unique in their specific concerns, and—unhappy in the same way.
Minimalism was a welcome success for pretty obvious reasons: it was a reversion and embrace of exactly those things at the heart of our embodied experience of music.
I mostly listen to minimalism but I wouldn't call 12-tone/serialism "dire." Like all periods, there's good and bad. On the other hand, I've lost my taste for Germanic 19th century music.
Matter of taste: the second Viennese school, Bartok & Shostakovitch is pretty much the only classical I can tolerate, the "mimsy" stuff leaves me cold. Horses for courses.
Bartok never wrote using the 12-tone serial method. He wrote dense harmonies, especially in his middle period (e.g. the sonatas for violin and piano), but in terms of how he devised those harmonies he has more in common with Glass than Schönberg.
Especially Bartok’s late works are more approachable (Concerto for Orchestra, Piano Concerto no. 3) and while they don’t slam home a tonal key like the end of Beethoven’s Fifth, the harmonies are plenty recognizable.
For those of you who want to experience 24-tone composition, listen to Angine de Poitrine:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ssi-9wS1so
Also King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard – Flying Microtonal Banana.
That is so cool. It made my day. Thanks.
If ever a blog post could have done with some playable media.
Here’s an example: Schönberg’s Variations for Orchestra (1928): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7wefv98lvo
12-tone serial music always sounds to me like it belongs in a film soundtrack — it works well as background because the serial method suppresses the creation of recognizable melody as a foreground element.
Film score composers are quite famous for borrowing from 12 tone serialism - quite a bit of discussion on it available by Googling or using your favourite chatbot
I'd recommend listening to Webern's Op. 27, it's a strict 2nd Viennese school 12-tone composition but also very expensive, I love it (although it works better in a concert setting then a recording): https://youtu.be/ZEtqEzPakxA?is=JgbN1lpHF1lxrXOT