I've been thinking about something in this space, actually... it feels like this is much more a UX/social problem -- in that a wiki can very much be modeled as a repo with a very permissive auto-merge bot (e.g. if PR only touches unprotected pages and user is registered, allow merge)
This is a really interesting direction. Thanks for sharing!
https://github.com/microsoft/skills/tree/main/.github/plugin... is similar, works for Claude Code, too. I ported it to Pi: https://pi.dev/packages/@amb007/deep-wiki?name=deep-wiki Elsewhere, I added deep-wiki:lookup that's like deep-wiki:ask but giving precedence to the wiki instead of the code.
Is this a name collision or is the related to the DAIR institute
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_Artificial_Intelli...
Looking at the name that keeps showing up on the linked site, I suspect a collision is most likely (to be charitable).
> A Claude Code Plugin
If the contributor instructions for your wiki requires:
1. forking the repo
2. committing the changes
3. submitting a pull request
... then you don't have a wiki.
I've been thinking about something in this space, actually... it feels like this is much more a UX/social problem -- in that a wiki can very much be modeled as a repo with a very permissive auto-merge bot (e.g. if PR only touches unprotected pages and user is registered, allow merge)
a pull request required to update a wiki? bruh.