"only about 20 percent of households had access to green loans from banks to do so, because they often require sufficient equity in a house and for the homeowner to have an active mortgage."
I get the equity requirement. But why an active mortgage?
The banks make very low profits on 0% interest (government subsidised green) loans with a max total lending limit of NZD50k and many approvals might be less than $10k. The loan needs to use the home as collateral.
It wouldn't be cost effective (for bank or lender) to originate a new loan: instead the green loan uses the paperwork from an existing loan.
The bank can use the existing mortgage's legal paperwork to attach the new debt to the lender's house for collateral.
Approval, legal, and eligibility costs are reduced because an active loan has already been approved. The bank mostly wants to check that the lender's likelihood of repayment hasn't drastically worsened (e.g. lost their job).
I think the idea is that if you don’t have an active mortgage then you have a lot more money available than someone with a mortgage, so money isn’t as much of a barrier for those people to put up the panels.
"only about 20 percent of households had access to green loans from banks to do so, because they often require sufficient equity in a house and for the homeowner to have an active mortgage."
I get the equity requirement. But why an active mortgage?
> why an active mortgage
The banks make very low profits on 0% interest (government subsidised green) loans with a max total lending limit of NZD50k and many approvals might be less than $10k. The loan needs to use the home as collateral.
It wouldn't be cost effective (for bank or lender) to originate a new loan: instead the green loan uses the paperwork from an existing loan.
The bank can use the existing mortgage's legal paperwork to attach the new debt to the lender's house for collateral.
Approval, legal, and eligibility costs are reduced because an active loan has already been approved. The bank mostly wants to check that the lender's likelihood of repayment hasn't drastically worsened (e.g. lost their job).
Add a loan fee and be done with it?
I think the idea is that if you don’t have an active mortgage then you have a lot more money available than someone with a mortgage, so money isn’t as much of a barrier for those people to put up the panels.
I don't get the active mortgage requirement either and I live in NZ.
Tim Sparks, at the Electricity Authority!?
The Energy Minister was, until recently, Simon Watts.
Thing is - the _install_ costs recently dropped while power price went significantly up.
And for comparison, power in Australia was always about 2x more expensive, while solar was about 2x cheaper. That's a 4x worse payback period in NZ!
> He said it was cheaper to put solar on houses than build solar farms
How?