Metastatic pancreatic cancer is the first indication for this class of RAS-inhibitor, but it certainly won't be the last, and it seems certain that there will be many many more cancers where this drug gets approved. There are mutations to activate KRAS in a substantial fraction of cancers across many organs, and but it's been such a hard protein to target with a drug that even decades ago I was told it was "undruggable."
What's going on with this new drug is a somewhat novel mechanism: instead of gumming up the enzymatic action of the protein, it acts as a glue between KRAS and a common "helper" protein, that then mucks up the RAS signalling. This sort of molecular glue mechanism has had a few examples built up over the past decade, but this is a really knock-it-out-of-the-park drug. Really amazing, and because of it lots of people are focusing lots of effort on how to discover more molecular glues.
One downer about this drug is the absolutely horrific side effects, like "your skin feels like you've been dipped in acid" kind of horrific. Still, pancreatic cancer is just that bad, so maybe that's worthwhile.
It's such a big deal to get a working RAS drug. Pharma companies will be pursuing additional drugs of the same class after this - much easier to be the second than the first. I think over the next few years we may see improvements on this, or better figure out how to use it and manage side effects. Very exciting!
Yes, the side effects were very extreme. As time goes on, I'm optimistic that management of the side effects will improve, and outcomes will improve along with that too. Much like chemotherapy, this type of treatment affects a lot of non-cancer cells too.
My father-in-law died of pancreatic cancer three months after diagnosis.
It is a horrible disease, not least of which because it’s difficult to diagnose. By the time they get a clear bead on it, in many cases, it’s stage four and already ravaging your system.
I’m very sorry for you and your family’s loss. And I hope this drug makes it so a lot fewer people have to go through this in the future.
I'm very sorry for your sister's death. My friend's dad was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer out of the blue and died within 6 weeks. It terrifies the fuck out of me because there's nothing you can do to detect it or fight it. Hopefully this drug helps people get cured of it.
My mother died of it less than two weeks after the diagnosis was confirmed by biopsy. On the other hand, I knew a guy at work who survived more than five years with it; this was so unusual there was an advocacy group that used him as a kind of poster child of hope. He looked just terrible though.
Beyond the data, this approval is notable for the speed from FDA acceptance of their new drug application (NDA) to FDA approval - just over a month. Compare this to the typical 8-12 month timelines we've historically seen for priority and standard reviews, respectively. This was enabled by the FDA's CNPV Pilot Program [0]
Seriously? So for example the covid vaccine should have been approved in 1 month based on the crisis response or because mRNA approach is transformative, or if it could be made in the US. I feel so much safer knowing a reckless FDA won't be a problem now.
I’m trying to understand your point. This drug is for people with metastasized cancer. I’m comfortable with fast tracking it, because what’s exactly the harm of letting desperate people try something that seems likely to help a lot?
Also, the risk profile is sort of the inverse of a covid vaccine where everyone was supposed to take it.
The FDA article lists 5 reasons the pilot of the pilot is only for the non controversial one that is not even listed in a way that maximizes its risk/benefit requirements.
Comparing the acceleration of FDA approvals for non-contagious terminal diseases like PDAC to development of COVID vaccines is flawed on so many levels. You make it sound as though this was just cooked up in some desert meth lab RV over a weekend, and the FDA just rubber-stamped after a cursory glance at the data. The Phase 1/2 study first exploring daraxonrasib (RMC-6236) was posted on clinicaltrials.gov in May 2022; this trial enrolled 754 patients [0]. The RASolute 302 study this approval is based on was first posted to clinicaltrials.gov in October 2024; this trial enrolled 500 patients [1]. Nevermind the years of preclinical discovery and translational work that had to precede human studies.
As you can see from the control arm showing 6.7mo of survival on standard of care chemotherapy, these patients have a very poor prognosis. Is this a cure? No. Does it buy time to see your child graduate, get married, or give birth? Quite possibly.
If you ever have the opportunity to work behind the scenes within the pharma industry and/or FDA, you'd be astonished that anything ever gets approved with all the red tape and complexity along the way. Medicine is not software - it operates within the black box of human biology which is incredibly nuanced from patient to patient.
Like many who have shared personal stories in this thread, I've lost friends to PDAC. It is a terrible disease often driven by a mutated oncogene (KRAS). Many cancers have KRAS-driven subtypes (lung, colorectal, low-grade serous ovarian, etc). The clinical platform and pipeline at RevMed has potential to address many other cancers. They have next-gen RAS agents that could be even more impactful.
For those curious, RevMed posted a solid summary of the approval on their IR site [2]
Read the stuff you link to. The FDA article on their criteria says nothing about it needing to be for terminal cancer (is high cholesterol terminal?) Make anthrax hemroid creme in the US and it meets the criteria of the pilot. You should stop falling for scams like being presented with a first result of a pilot that is an improvement and not reading that the pilot itself was created for the other 4 scam cases.
Good post but the whole "buy time to see your child graduate, get married or give birth" trope is quite frankly very annoying.
Older people have more going on, and more reasons to live, than whatever the next generations are up to. Even if we have children.
I had curative (hopefully, presumably) kidney cancer surgery 11 years ago. So far I've enjoyed travelling, socializing, working, coding, chess and other hobbies in the extra time I've been granted and I hope for decades more time to enjoy life. I don't have children. never aspired to it.
My dad was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in December 2019 and thankfully caught wind of it in its early stages due to an eagle-eyed nurse going over some routine blood work and noting his liver numbers were off, he should talk to the doctor.
You can imagine how hard it was to be sick in the early days of COVID, much less have to go to the hospital on a regular basis to receive chemotherapy for hours on end. Our family was lucky that he responded well to treatment at least and we had a few extra years with him before he passed away in late 2023.
Cancer is a terrible thing but pancreatic cancer is especially horrible due to the difficulty in detection when you're in otherwise good health. The fact that intense medical research into retrovirals has yielded something so significant as the RAS-inhibitor is nothing short of miraculous.
My mom was diagnosed with borderline stage-4 pancreatic cancer. Fortunately she had an aggressive surgeon willing to do a Whipple procedure, and survived almost 4 years after a 4-6 month prognosis.
We were incredibly lucky to even have that time with her. Pancreatic is one of the worst cancers someone can get — both for survival and quality of life.
I’m very happy to see that we’re finally making meaningful progress on treatment.
Someone I love dearly passed two weeks ago from this awful cancer. She was on a trial for this drug, but it was ineffective, sadly. I can't stop crying. This is a horrible disease and I am so glad there are developments being made in this to extend people's lives, possibly even save them.
My dad passed in 2020 from pancreatic cancer. He'd been to the doctor several times complaining about issues and all they would do is send him home with laxatives. Eventually it got bad enough my mom ran him to the ER when they found the cancer which had progressed into its final stages already. He was dead less than a month later.
Similar story with a guy I worked with. He went home sick one day. A few days later our boss told us he was sick and had pancreatic cancer. He came into the office to say goodbye to us a few weeks later and then died about 10 days after that.
FWIW it's commonly the case with cancers of abdominal organs: stomach, pancreas, liver, kidney, etc. These cancers are frequently not diagnosed until at an advanced stage. Symptoms tend to be nonspecific, overlap with ubiquitous conditions like constipation, gastritis.
A goal of research is improving early detection of these cancers but it's an uphill battle. It's difficult to increase providers' "index of suspicion" of seemingly "minor" complaints.
That’s a generalization, pancreatic cancer is often extremely lethal, depending on the type and case the survival rate can be as or more grim than glioma. Bowel and urinary cancers including kidney cancer are often very treatable and survivable when discovered due to symptoms. I don’t think it’s helpful to group all abdominal cancers as being uniquely or especially bad or late discovered. Likewise for the particularly aggressive or advanced cancers these types of announcements and trials rarely translate to major changes in prognosis. More typical if there is any positive result it looks like additional weeks or at best months of aggressive treatments rather than significant ”cure” rates.
It can be disappointing to see that even a successful drug, like this one, is "only" extending life expectancy from 6.7 months to 13.2. But this is what the first steps towards a cure look like.
Childhood leukemia used to be overwhelmingly fatal, and early chemotherapy trials also only managed a couple months of remission. Researchers were even criticized for subjecting patients to harsh side effects to no apparent benefit. But thanks to that research, most patients are now cured; per capita death rates from childhood leukemia are down 14x from the 1950s, mostly driven by improved treatment.
Daraxonrasib is an incredible invention on a technical level, and a meaningful step forwards in the treatment of many cancers. We'll need a couple more equally incredible inventions to be able to cure pancreatic cancer.
Moderna is testing an mRNA vaccine that might be useful against bladder and kidney cancers. Hopefully the same technology can be applied to pancreatic and liver cancers. Fingers crossed.
We are able to early detect these cancers right now with routine targeted imaging. Perhaps we should be working to solve or improve on the drawbacks associated with doing this, some of which are:
CT scans emit ionizing radiation.
MRI contrast can buildup and be retained in the body over repeated administrations.
The scans can produce false positives, surface benign abnormalities which result in a wild goose chase, cause severe patient anxiety and healthcare burden, and result in over-treatment.
And of course doing this on a whole population level is not cost or time effective.
Absolutely terrible. As human beings, we should be prioritizing solving these kinds of problems. I don't think we need to live forever, but a graceful ending later in life remains an objective we haven't fully realized for everyone.
We do. There’s something like half a billion dollars spent on pancreatic cancer research annually in the United States alone. It’s a giant money pit and that’s created an enormous body of research, increased understanding of the biology of the cancer and just how insidious it is, and funded the careers of thousands of scientists, technicians, academics and administrators, but very little of all this translates into better treatment outcomes. There’s no evidence than just pouring more money into cancer research is going to give us a miracle cure. There are competing priorities starved for funding to that we know can use meaningful help. Not incidentally some of those include financial aid, medical care and quality of life assistance for the actual patients and their families, as well as prevention.
My father in law was diagnosed with stage 4 pancreatic cancer that's spread to his lungs about a month ago. This news today raised my wife's hopes immensely and had them immediately doused after hearing the oncologist say that although the drug is approved it will take months before they are able to prescribe it.
Father in law started chemo a few weeks ago and his condition deteriorated quickly, he's been at the hospital since; switching between ICU and general care. His abdomen fills up with fluid, around 6 liters every 5 days, draining the fluid plunges his blood pressure and he end up in ICU. They supply Albumin until blood pressure stabilizes and send him back to general. Only after the first chemo session the oncologists have stopped the treatment saying he's no longer eligible for chemo because of his over all health.
We're lucky enough to live an hour away from Johns Hopkins (though that's not the hospital he's currently at) and had an appointment scheduled but had to cancel since he's unable to walk.
The oncologist mentioned that daraxonrasib was available as an option when he first started chemo, but said he would only be eligible for it after trying chemo, so we know the drug is available.
Are there any tips from HN on how we can approach getting this medicine for my father in law?
I would suggest you have your physician submit a Expanded access request immediately, because the same page says that they will close this program after FDA approval as they transition to commercial use, but the timeline for that is unclear.
Ask the oncologist directly. Also, try contacting Revolution Medicines directly (the manufacturer), and/or go through their early access page: https://www.revmed.com/expanded-access-policy/
Thank you for sharing, the oncologists are saying that at this point in the diseases progression the same things that disqualify him from getting chemo also disqualify him from this drug. That in his current state it would do more harm.
I hope many others are helped by daraxonrasib, the key factor seems to be how early the cancer is detected, because it is an extremely fast acting disease.
I would argue that it is not underfunded, as most big pharma companies with oncology products have dumped enormous amounts of money into research pipelines and clinical trials. Immunotherapies like nivolumab or ipilimumab or pembrolizumab have varying (but often very decent) efficacy data for metastatic disease across tumor types.
Metastatic pancreatic cancer is the first indication for this class of RAS-inhibitor, but it certainly won't be the last, and it seems certain that there will be many many more cancers where this drug gets approved. There are mutations to activate KRAS in a substantial fraction of cancers across many organs, and but it's been such a hard protein to target with a drug that even decades ago I was told it was "undruggable."
What's going on with this new drug is a somewhat novel mechanism: instead of gumming up the enzymatic action of the protein, it acts as a glue between KRAS and a common "helper" protein, that then mucks up the RAS signalling. This sort of molecular glue mechanism has had a few examples built up over the past decade, but this is a really knock-it-out-of-the-park drug. Really amazing, and because of it lots of people are focusing lots of effort on how to discover more molecular glues.
One downer about this drug is the absolutely horrific side effects, like "your skin feels like you've been dipped in acid" kind of horrific. Still, pancreatic cancer is just that bad, so maybe that's worthwhile.
It's such a big deal to get a working RAS drug. Pharma companies will be pursuing additional drugs of the same class after this - much easier to be the second than the first. I think over the next few years we may see improvements on this, or better figure out how to use it and manage side effects. Very exciting!
Yes, the side effects were very extreme. As time goes on, I'm optimistic that management of the side effects will improve, and outcomes will improve along with that too. Much like chemotherapy, this type of treatment affects a lot of non-cancer cells too.
My sister was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in October (48 years old) and died in June from it.
I'm glad to see a drug like this developed for people suffering from pancreatic cancer. I don't wish what my sister went through on anyone.
Damn if I don't wish it had come a little sooner.
My father-in-law died of pancreatic cancer three months after diagnosis.
It is a horrible disease, not least of which because it’s difficult to diagnose. By the time they get a clear bead on it, in many cases, it’s stage four and already ravaging your system.
I’m very sorry for you and your family’s loss. And I hope this drug makes it so a lot fewer people have to go through this in the future.
I'm very sorry for your sister's death. My friend's dad was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer out of the blue and died within 6 weeks. It terrifies the fuck out of me because there's nothing you can do to detect it or fight it. Hopefully this drug helps people get cured of it.
Sorry for your loss. My mémère passed recently from it. It's a terrible illness and I'm glad that others can have more time.
mémère Is French for grandmother, for other readers, since I looked it up.
My mother died of it less than two weeks after the diagnosis was confirmed by biopsy. On the other hand, I knew a guy at work who survived more than five years with it; this was so unusual there was an advocacy group that used him as a kind of poster child of hope. He looked just terrible though.
a lot depends on the exact diagnosis, both stage and the specific kind of pancreatic cancer
Beyond the data, this approval is notable for the speed from FDA acceptance of their new drug application (NDA) to FDA approval - just over a month. Compare this to the typical 8-12 month timelines we've historically seen for priority and standard reviews, respectively. This was enabled by the FDA's CNPV Pilot Program [0]
Previous discussion following the data presentation at ASCO: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48517199
[0] https://www.fda.gov/industry/commissioners-national-priority...
Seriously? So for example the covid vaccine should have been approved in 1 month based on the crisis response or because mRNA approach is transformative, or if it could be made in the US. I feel so much safer knowing a reckless FDA won't be a problem now.
I’m trying to understand your point. This drug is for people with metastasized cancer. I’m comfortable with fast tracking it, because what’s exactly the harm of letting desperate people try something that seems likely to help a lot?
Also, the risk profile is sort of the inverse of a covid vaccine where everyone was supposed to take it.
The FDA article lists 5 reasons the pilot of the pilot is only for the non controversial one that is not even listed in a way that maximizes its risk/benefit requirements.
Comparing the acceleration of FDA approvals for non-contagious terminal diseases like PDAC to development of COVID vaccines is flawed on so many levels. You make it sound as though this was just cooked up in some desert meth lab RV over a weekend, and the FDA just rubber-stamped after a cursory glance at the data. The Phase 1/2 study first exploring daraxonrasib (RMC-6236) was posted on clinicaltrials.gov in May 2022; this trial enrolled 754 patients [0]. The RASolute 302 study this approval is based on was first posted to clinicaltrials.gov in October 2024; this trial enrolled 500 patients [1]. Nevermind the years of preclinical discovery and translational work that had to precede human studies.
As you can see from the control arm showing 6.7mo of survival on standard of care chemotherapy, these patients have a very poor prognosis. Is this a cure? No. Does it buy time to see your child graduate, get married, or give birth? Quite possibly.
If you ever have the opportunity to work behind the scenes within the pharma industry and/or FDA, you'd be astonished that anything ever gets approved with all the red tape and complexity along the way. Medicine is not software - it operates within the black box of human biology which is incredibly nuanced from patient to patient.
Like many who have shared personal stories in this thread, I've lost friends to PDAC. It is a terrible disease often driven by a mutated oncogene (KRAS). Many cancers have KRAS-driven subtypes (lung, colorectal, low-grade serous ovarian, etc). The clinical platform and pipeline at RevMed has potential to address many other cancers. They have next-gen RAS agents that could be even more impactful.
For those curious, RevMed posted a solid summary of the approval on their IR site [2]
[0] https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05379985?tab=researcher [1] https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06625320?tab=researcher [2]https://ir.revmed.com/static-files/0f7e4612-ad39-4c87-b266-8...
Read the stuff you link to. The FDA article on their criteria says nothing about it needing to be for terminal cancer (is high cholesterol terminal?) Make anthrax hemroid creme in the US and it meets the criteria of the pilot. You should stop falling for scams like being presented with a first result of a pilot that is an improvement and not reading that the pilot itself was created for the other 4 scam cases.
Good post but the whole "buy time to see your child graduate, get married or give birth" trope is quite frankly very annoying.
Older people have more going on, and more reasons to live, than whatever the next generations are up to. Even if we have children.
I had curative (hopefully, presumably) kidney cancer surgery 11 years ago. So far I've enjoyed travelling, socializing, working, coding, chess and other hobbies in the extra time I've been granted and I hope for decades more time to enjoy life. I don't have children. never aspired to it.
Sorry for the rant!
My dad was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in December 2019 and thankfully caught wind of it in its early stages due to an eagle-eyed nurse going over some routine blood work and noting his liver numbers were off, he should talk to the doctor.
You can imagine how hard it was to be sick in the early days of COVID, much less have to go to the hospital on a regular basis to receive chemotherapy for hours on end. Our family was lucky that he responded well to treatment at least and we had a few extra years with him before he passed away in late 2023.
Cancer is a terrible thing but pancreatic cancer is especially horrible due to the difficulty in detection when you're in otherwise good health. The fact that intense medical research into retrovirals has yielded something so significant as the RAS-inhibitor is nothing short of miraculous.
My mom was diagnosed with borderline stage-4 pancreatic cancer. Fortunately she had an aggressive surgeon willing to do a Whipple procedure, and survived almost 4 years after a 4-6 month prognosis.
We were incredibly lucky to even have that time with her. Pancreatic is one of the worst cancers someone can get — both for survival and quality of life.
I’m very happy to see that we’re finally making meaningful progress on treatment.
Someone I love dearly passed two weeks ago from this awful cancer. She was on a trial for this drug, but it was ineffective, sadly. I can't stop crying. This is a horrible disease and I am so glad there are developments being made in this to extend people's lives, possibly even save them.
Fuck cancer.
My dad passed in 2020 from pancreatic cancer. He'd been to the doctor several times complaining about issues and all they would do is send him home with laxatives. Eventually it got bad enough my mom ran him to the ER when they found the cancer which had progressed into its final stages already. He was dead less than a month later.
Similar story with a guy I worked with. He went home sick one day. A few days later our boss told us he was sick and had pancreatic cancer. He came into the office to say goodbye to us a few weeks later and then died about 10 days after that.
Fuck cancer
Matt Bencke's pancreatic cancer story has stuck with me.
First sign in May, followed by several doctor visits which treat the symptoms.
In late July, he heads to the ER. Multiple tests later, he and his wife get the diagnosis.
He dies less than three months later.
see https://www.wired.com/story/the-day-i-found-out-my-life-was-...
I had never heard of this story before. Thank you for sharing it.
There's also Randy Pausch, who had pancreatic cancer, and The Last Lecture.
see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randy_Pausch#Cancer_and_death
CMU posted an HD version of his Last Lecture - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayPMfopCe1g
FWIW it's commonly the case with cancers of abdominal organs: stomach, pancreas, liver, kidney, etc. These cancers are frequently not diagnosed until at an advanced stage. Symptoms tend to be nonspecific, overlap with ubiquitous conditions like constipation, gastritis.
A goal of research is improving early detection of these cancers but it's an uphill battle. It's difficult to increase providers' "index of suspicion" of seemingly "minor" complaints.
That’s a generalization, pancreatic cancer is often extremely lethal, depending on the type and case the survival rate can be as or more grim than glioma. Bowel and urinary cancers including kidney cancer are often very treatable and survivable when discovered due to symptoms. I don’t think it’s helpful to group all abdominal cancers as being uniquely or especially bad or late discovered. Likewise for the particularly aggressive or advanced cancers these types of announcements and trials rarely translate to major changes in prognosis. More typical if there is any positive result it looks like additional weeks or at best months of aggressive treatments rather than significant ”cure” rates.
It can be disappointing to see that even a successful drug, like this one, is "only" extending life expectancy from 6.7 months to 13.2. But this is what the first steps towards a cure look like.
Childhood leukemia used to be overwhelmingly fatal, and early chemotherapy trials also only managed a couple months of remission. Researchers were even criticized for subjecting patients to harsh side effects to no apparent benefit. But thanks to that research, most patients are now cured; per capita death rates from childhood leukemia are down 14x from the 1950s, mostly driven by improved treatment.
Daraxonrasib is an incredible invention on a technical level, and a meaningful step forwards in the treatment of many cancers. We'll need a couple more equally incredible inventions to be able to cure pancreatic cancer.
Moderna is testing an mRNA vaccine that might be useful against bladder and kidney cancers. Hopefully the same technology can be applied to pancreatic and liver cancers. Fingers crossed.
We are able to early detect these cancers right now with routine targeted imaging. Perhaps we should be working to solve or improve on the drawbacks associated with doing this, some of which are:
CT scans emit ionizing radiation.
MRI contrast can buildup and be retained in the body over repeated administrations.
The scans can produce false positives, surface benign abnormalities which result in a wild goose chase, cause severe patient anxiety and healthcare burden, and result in over-treatment.
And of course doing this on a whole population level is not cost or time effective.
> And of course doing this on a whole population level is not cost or time effective.
It will never be cost or time effective if we never try. I'm paying out of pocket every year for an MRI scan, this was my second year this past year.
Absolutely terrible. As human beings, we should be prioritizing solving these kinds of problems. I don't think we need to live forever, but a graceful ending later in life remains an objective we haven't fully realized for everyone.
We do. There’s something like half a billion dollars spent on pancreatic cancer research annually in the United States alone. It’s a giant money pit and that’s created an enormous body of research, increased understanding of the biology of the cancer and just how insidious it is, and funded the careers of thousands of scientists, technicians, academics and administrators, but very little of all this translates into better treatment outcomes. There’s no evidence than just pouring more money into cancer research is going to give us a miracle cure. There are competing priorities starved for funding to that we know can use meaningful help. Not incidentally some of those include financial aid, medical care and quality of life assistance for the actual patients and their families, as well as prevention.
good point
My father in law was diagnosed with stage 4 pancreatic cancer that's spread to his lungs about a month ago. This news today raised my wife's hopes immensely and had them immediately doused after hearing the oncologist say that although the drug is approved it will take months before they are able to prescribe it.
Father in law started chemo a few weeks ago and his condition deteriorated quickly, he's been at the hospital since; switching between ICU and general care. His abdomen fills up with fluid, around 6 liters every 5 days, draining the fluid plunges his blood pressure and he end up in ICU. They supply Albumin until blood pressure stabilizes and send him back to general. Only after the first chemo session the oncologists have stopped the treatment saying he's no longer eligible for chemo because of his over all health.
We're lucky enough to live an hour away from Johns Hopkins (though that's not the hospital he's currently at) and had an appointment scheduled but had to cancel since he's unable to walk.
The oncologist mentioned that daraxonrasib was available as an option when he first started chemo, but said he would only be eligible for it after trying chemo, so we know the drug is available.
Are there any tips from HN on how we can approach getting this medicine for my father in law?
Revolution Medicines has an Expanded access program: https://www.revmed.com/expanded-access-policy/
I would suggest you have your physician submit a Expanded access request immediately, because the same page says that they will close this program after FDA approval as they transition to commercial use, but the timeline for that is unclear.
Thank you for sharing.
Ask the oncologist directly. Also, try contacting Revolution Medicines directly (the manufacturer), and/or go through their early access page: https://www.revmed.com/expanded-access-policy/
Thank you for sharing, the oncologists are saying that at this point in the diseases progression the same things that disqualify him from getting chemo also disqualify him from this drug. That in his current state it would do more harm.
I hope many others are helped by daraxonrasib, the key factor seems to be how early the cancer is detected, because it is an extremely fast acting disease.
The therapy does not provide a cure. Just prolongs lives for only few more months, unfortunately .
We’re nowhere close to it, but if we actually solve the vast majority of cancers, we will have taken several steps towards a true utopia
Assuming access to those solutions for everyone, sure.
Fantastic news. Research on Metastatic treatments has been underfunded. Yet immunotherapy and other treatments are showing amazing promise.
I would argue that it is not underfunded, as most big pharma companies with oncology products have dumped enormous amounts of money into research pipelines and clinical trials. Immunotherapies like nivolumab or ipilimumab or pembrolizumab have varying (but often very decent) efficacy data for metastatic disease across tumor types.
thats great news !